QUOTE
So one's environment dictates what one believes in? For an atheist that is pretty fucking deterministic =P
Tell that to any person dwelling in a prominently Muslim nation. Further more, tell that to any so-called American Christian that hasn't read up on his/her bible (
Christians here love to hit you over the head with a book they haven't even read). A person that exhibits the inability to think for oneself is very likely to adopt the mindset and ideals of those around them... Parents, peers, teachers, and ministers alike. For example; I know many individuals that have are of a conservative political mindset because their parents have brought them up to have those values. This is purely a case of
nurture. If you or I were born somewhere else we might have subjugated into believing in the god of Allah or ________ (
insert god here.)
QUOTE
Also evolution is not the blooming answer to all things metaphysical. Its not like people were logically stunted until Darwin showed up.
I was using the theory of evolution as an example. You didn't have any qualms about me mentioning genetics. I'm merely illustrating the point that the more we know and understand the true state of the universe, the more we realize just how intangible and distant god (
whatever that means to you) really is. Think back at people of more primitive cultures... These people believed that god was casting rain, famine, lightning bolts, and guiding their very existences. Through our advancements in science and understanding we've seen first hand how how the concept god has been whittled down to a nub.
It's like "god" is the light. And man is the prism that splits that light into many distinguishable colors. Men will forever fight over which faith represents the true color of god.
QUOTE
No offense taken, but at no point did I bring up a PERSONAL god. You are implying that when I say God, I have a set definition. From books on the matter Einstein was a religious (or spiritual if you prefer) person who also said "god does not play dice" which at least supposes a figurative "face" for god. When I speak of God i mean in the mysterious metaphorical sense too, I will be the last person to offer definitive answers.
If you mean god in a metaphorical sense (
as do I) and not as a personal god, than you believe that there are things in this universe in which man cannot explain through natural means... How can you be so certain of that? If feel like you're throwing in with a god because you think there are things in this universe in which man can NEVER understand. You're dealing with a absolute here. And further more, it feels as though you're playing "god of the gaps". Just because we cannot explain it at the moment does not mean that god is the only possible explanation. A thousand years ago germ theory wasn't even drempt of yet, and naturally people played "god of the gaps". They could not comprehend illness and death caused my microscopic organisms.... so.... God must have been responsible.
Imagine what we'll know 1,000 years from now.
I feel as though you ARE offering a definitive answer on the question of gods' existence though.
QUOTE
And to think I would scrape from a creationist site is a slap to my gonads sir!
Sorry. You do come off as that kind of person though... At least in your internet discussions.
As probably do I come of as some Darwin worshiping idiot that knows not what he's even discussing.
QUOTE
Again, the use of the word "himself" hints at a man-like god, whether he beleived that is neither here nor there, jsut saying for the sake of points.
My mistake.
QUOTE
That's his interpretation of a million different ways to conceptualize god. The bottom line is he believed in a higher power, energy itself maybe, who knows but he subscribes divinity to what many scientists beleive to be completely mundane.
We know that there's energy in the universe.... And there's mass. But why do we have to re-label these concepts. If we find out that pure energy is responsible for everything in the universe that energy does not suddenly become god. It's just a term. There's no sense in calling things explained or unexplained in the natural world "god".
QUOTE
One does not have to adhere to a race, creed or collective to believe in god(s) no matter how tangible or abstract. So he doesn't think the Jewish people are the chosen. This belief is shared by others both theists and non theists, jewish and non-jewish.
What I found compelling about that quote is how brilliantly it illustrates how most religious groups think that they are the chosen, the truth, and the light. They can't all be right? But I understand now that you're not referring to any of those particular ideological mindsets.
QUOTE
And yet again, the assumption that I or anyone else who discusses god in general terms is a Creationist. This is fallacious and ignorant. And for the record, as much as i like discussing theology, I am not trying to convince anyone of anything. If you feel threatened by the discussion, thats on your dime not mine. I thought this was a forum, where people exchange ideas. And one that is flavored by the band's appreciation for mythology and metaphysics, which is evident in their music.
How can I take you any other way when you assert that god must be real in some form or another.
Have you entertained the idea that there may not be? That there doesn't have to be one?
If I'm threatened by anything, it's the constant barrage of double-talk you've bombarded me with.
In one hand, you'll lay out a carefully reasoned argument and you'll cover pretty much all the different views.
And on the other hand, you boldly assert that there IS indeed a god (
and that none of this universe we live in is even possible without the existence of that particular influence). <<< "
If this particular little bit is an inaccurate representation of what you think god is responsible for than please correct me."If you were truly neutral (
which I don't think you are, from what you've shown me) you would've at least acknowledged the possibility of a universe free from divine or supernatural influence. Just because we can't explain something does not make a case for god. And an unexplainable constant or event or... Whatever is not grounds for a supernatural influence.
QUOTE
My only argument is god, of some sort, exists. The rest is us shooting the breeze and bouncing ideas around.
How can you possibly know that? You said it very plainly right there^^^.
I've really enjoyed this back and forth
streetshaman. I've actually learned quite a bit. About how I need to define and articulate my ideas more thoroughly, and how I need to ask more questions to the opposition to better understand their beliefs before just asserting what I
think they believe.
Until next time..... Stay skeptical!